Wednesday, February 10, 2010

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XXI

Jerusalem, Israel

U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONS – STILL STRONG AS EVER?

According to recent statistics highlighted at the Herzliya Conference in Tel Aviv last week, currently 46% of Americans sympathize with Israel -- a number that has been consistent since 1967. Less than 12% of Americans sympathize with the Palestinian cause. What’s disturbing is that 30% of Americans don’t seem to care about either the Arabs or the Israelis, and there is a certain indifference in the United States to the on-going conflict in the Middle East.

As pointed out by Alfred Moses, Chairman of the UN Watch, and one of the speakers on U.S.-Israel relations at the conference, American President Barack Obama is currently focused more on Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran. After his first year in office, Obama let the American public know, in a Time magazine interview, that he had made mistakes in foreign policy regarding Israel and the Palestinians. He admitted that his expectations had been too high of what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas could deliver. In Obama’s January 2010 State of the Union address, he spoke long and hard about domestic policy, especially America’s recessive economy, including the need to reduce unemployment by creating new jobs. However, very little emphasis of his speech was on the Middle East, and there was no focus on new strategies for jumpstarting peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Danny Ayalon, told Herzliya Conference participants that the U.S. and Israel are natural partners and the relationship has never been better. He argued that the pundits and the media are zeroing in on things which are not important. Pointing out that Obama re-affirmed the $30 billion aid package to Israel, early in his Administration, Ayalon said the U.S. commitment is iron clad. “If you look at the cooperation in terms of military, intelligence, and defense, things have been as good as any time I can recall,” he explained.

For Israelis, the U.S. partnership is not only about democracy, but about ideals, and Ayalon spoke about American grass roots support for Israel that goes beyond Congress, the Obama Administration and the U.S. government. He insisted that, though there have been some hiccups, twists and turns in the road, the U.S. and Israel are working on the same side.

The fact that the U.S. supports the only democracy in the Middle East, gives America added strength, according to Ayalon. He called the U.S. an “indispensable country” because U.S. policy does not change the American attitude of supporting Israel as a nation that believes in the same values. Ayalon further pointed out that the Israeli government sees the American administration as friendly, despite media reports.

As for the current impasse between Netanyahu and Abbas, “All parts of the coalition in Israel would like to see a peaceful solution and a resumption of negotiations, and I believe we are all waiting on the Palestinian side,” declared Ayalon.

Malcolm Hoenlin, Executive Vice Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, was not as positive in his approach to U.S.-Israel relations at the conference. While he agreed that the special relationship is intact, it is not the way some would like to see it. Hoenlin pointed out that many U.S. administrations fall into the trap of thinking they have a solution to Middle East problems. U.S. presidents believe they are going to engage the parties and come up with satisfactory resolutions.

Speaking to Hoenlin on the sidelines of the Herzliya Conference, this writer asked him about Obama’s first year. Hoenlin described an over-emphasis on an Israeli settlement freeze for natural growth, which was a demand that Israel couldn’t meet and didn’t. There was also disappointment on the follow-up to Obama’s Cairo speech, especially expectations of Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries that weren’t fulfilled. “Every president comes into office thinking he is going to make peace in the Middle East. This was no different,” Hoenlin explained.

As Obama and his staff re-think American foreign policy vis-à-vis Israel and the Palestinians, Hoenlin believes that disagreements between the two countries need to remain private. Publicly, the U.S. and Israel should be seen as standing together. He stated that when there are differences brought out, publicly, between the two countries, disagreements get blown out of proportion, especially in the media.

Furthermore, what’s really important, according to Hoenlin, is not to take the rapport between the U.S. and Israel for granted. He explained that the relationship is not immune to challenges. It goes up and down, while the core of this friendship remains the same.

Hoenlin is concerned that with the rise in global anti-Semitism, as well as the anti-Israel sentiment on U.S. college campuses, it is crucial to prepare the American public for the dangers that lie ahead. “Just because the numbers are as strong as ever, we can’t sit back and relax, because there are a lot of forces at play seeking to undermine the relationship between the U.S. and Israel. This effort at de-legitimization (of Israel) that we have seen in Europe is coming to the U.S.,” Hoenlin warned.

Anti-Semitism is the highest it has been since World War II, especially in countries like Britain and France. Efforts are underway at universities, among academics, and in elite circles, to influence grass-roots support for Israel. “It’s a process that I call the poisoning of the elites,” explained Hoenlin. He said it starts with small groups, then expands, and filters down into the populace as a hold. “Then, you see the numbers start eroding because they spread these lies, these distortions.” Hoenlin referred to the Goldstone Report which he feels was misused and accepted, despite being full of inaccuracies and falsehoods.

Speaking of the U.S.-Israel relationship, Hoenlin re-emphasized, “We have to be on guard, we can’t take for granted this relationship, neither on a political level, or the level of the people. We have to think creatively to make Israel’s case. Just tell the truth. I think that’s Israel’s strongest weapon.”

Most Americans want to see Israel remain strong. The consensus is that, if America and Israel are seen as having a poor connection, this could be problematic when dealing with other Middle East countries. In the opinion of both Israeli and American leaders, showing the connection between Israel and America as being unbreakable is essential in resisting the tide of radical Islam.

Meanwhile, despite the fact that Obama did not produce the foreign policy breakthrough he had hoped for, U.S. Ambassador to Israel, James Cunningham, explained that Obama is determined to continue trying to make peace in the region. Speaking at the Herzliya Conference, Cunningham acknowledged, “We are intent on proceeding down the path which we have set out. We continue to have a sense of urgency and disappointment in what has not been achieved in the peace effort so far.”

As differences on how to pursue peace in the region continue to surface between the U.S. and Israel, leaders in both nations are determined to get across to the global public that the goals and interests of both countries are the same. As of now, the U.S. plans to stand squarely with Israel if there is political or military action necessary in order to meet future threats to the Jewish State. The U.S. continues to recognize and support Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorism and aggression in the Middle East... a goal that American citizens can relate to at home.

Whether this unique relationship will remain strong in the future, or erode because of growing anti-Israel hatred in the U.S., remains to be seen. Hoenlin emphasized, “In terms of global support, Israel can never count on anyone but itself....Israel has to make decisions for itself, and protect its own interests.”

As Israel readjusts its future foreign policy initiatives, the hope of Israeli leaders and citizens, alike, is that they can trust the United States to back them up, in peace or war. Israel will continue to look for friends in America who understand the necessity of the strategic U.S.-Israel relationship, especially in terms of the continued survival of the Jewish State. It’s a relationship that affects two democratic allies, focusing their strengths on solving problems in a hostile region, and neither country can afford to find themselves on opposing sides.

PRAYER POINTS:

(1) Thank the Lord, according to Psalm 102:13, that He will have mercy on Zion; that the time to favor her is now; the set time has come. Pray that His favor extends into the nations, especially into America, where grass roots support for Israel is still strong. Pray that it remains strong, especially among Bible-believing pro-Israel supporters.

(2) Pray that Israel will listen to the Lord and walk in His ways so that He will soon subdue her enemies, and turn His hand against her adversaries. (Psalm 81:13-14). Ask the Lord to reverse the decree of global hatred towards His chosen people. Pray that He will shield and defend Jews in the Diaspora from the violence perpetuated against them through anti-Semitic acts. (See Genesis 15:1; Psalm 3:3; Psalm 5:12; Psalm 28:7; Psalm 33:20; Psalm 84:11; Psalm 115:9-11; Proverbs 30:5).

(3) Pray, according to Psalm 85:8-13, that the Lord will speak peace to His people and to His saints, and that His glory will dwell in Israel. Pray also that mercy and truth will prevail in the land.

Monday, January 25, 2010

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XX

Jerusalem, Israel

NETANYAHU SPEAKS TO THE MEDIA ABOUT PEACE

In a speech before foreign journalists in Jerusalem on Wednesday night, January 20th, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, appealed, once again, to the Palestinians to come to the peace table. “Let’s stop talking about talking. Let’s stop filing pre-conditions. Let’s get on with peace negotiations,” he said, showing his frustration with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. “This man doesn’t really want to negotiate. He wants to stop negotiating,” Netanyahu added.

For nine months the Netanyahu government has been trying to jumpstart new peace talks with the Palestinians. For nine months the Palestinians have not only refused to sit down with Israel, but continue to bring up demands for concessions before talks are ever held. “We are ready to begin. I’m ready to begin,” Netanyahu told journalists at the press conference. “I’m prepared for peace. Are the Palestinians ready for peace?”

Netanyahu’s comments come as American peace envoy George Mitchell visits the Middle East again, hoping to bridge the diplomatic and ideological gap that exists between Abbas and Netanyahu. U.S. President Barack Obama has admitted that U.S. expectations were too high to expect that the two men could find a way back to the peace table to solve the conflict. But, it may have been Obama’s blatant demands of Israel, in the beginning of his term, which caused the Palestinians to believe he was on their side, and they could raise their level of demands.

Netanyahu’s Likud party has kept him to Israel’s “red lines” where there is no more wiggle room. Those “red lines” include no compromise on the status of Jerusalem, which Israel says will remain the capitol of the Jewish State; and, a refusal to allow Palestinian so-called “refugees” to reside in Israel, if a Palestinian state does become a reality.

With much chagrin, the Netanyahu government implemented a settlement freeze on new construction in November 2009, which Israel is committed to for nine months, in hopes the peace process will advance. Many Israelis wonder if pressure from the international community will cause Netanyahu to try and extend that freeze.

In the meantime, Israel seems willing to consider a land withdrawal from the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), but not to the 1967 Green Line. Netanyahu and other Israeli government leaders have indicated that such a compromise would be suicidal for Israel, leaving the Jewish State with indefensible borders. Concerned about the overwhelming amount of missiles that have been smuggled through the Egyptian border to Hamas in Gaza, Netanyahu claims that even with Israel’s new anti-missile defense systems, the country is still vulnerable to rocket attacks on its citizens. His answer, spoken publicly for the first time, was for Israel to have a presence on the eastern side of a prospective Palestinian state. This would secure Israel along the Jordan Valley. His words promoted an angry response from Palestinian leaders.

In the months since he became Prime Minister, Netanyahu has been sidelined by Abbas who has spent his time securing the backing of Arab states, as well, as the UN and EU for the Palestinian cause. Abbas has looked to internationalize the conflict, hoping global leaders would impose a solution on Israel within a given timetable. Israel has said this will never work.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has spent much of his time in office in efforts to help the Palestinians engage in state-building, offering concessions that have not been graciously received. During the press conference he spelled out the various ways Israel has looked to make peace:

(1) Continuing to call for peace talks. (2) Removing hundreds of road blocks and checkpoints. (3) Netanyahu’s willingness to take risks as outlined in his Bar Ilan University speech in June 2009, which formed a national Israeli consensus of the idea of a demilitarized Palestinian state. (4) Temporary freeze on construction of settlements in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria).

Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman recently stated that Israel should not give any more concessions to the Palestinians in order to get the peace process moving forward. On the heels of George Mitchell’s meetings in the region, Netanyahu had his own message for the U.S. mediator, “They should be told fair and square, simple and forthrightly, get into the tent and start negotiating for peace. Let’s stop negotiating about negotiations.”

However, as Americans look towards another year of fruitless efforts by the Obama Administration to affect change in the Middle East, there may be a call for less diplomatic U.S. involvement. Obama’s pre-occupation with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may not be well-received by a U.S. population that sees no progress, and is dealing with pressing issues at home. Americans might just demand that Obama focus more on his domestic problems, while letting the Israelis and Palestinians fight it out alone.

PRAYER POINTS:

(1) Pray that Israelis and Palestinians will trust in the Lord, their Sar Shalom for His true peace.

(2) Psalm 4:8 says, “I will both lie down in peace, and sleep; For you alone, O Lord, make me dwell in safety.” As the current diplomatic peace process remains on hold, pray that Israel will not face violence from her enemies, but the Lord will be a shield around her.

(3) Pray for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to find increased favor within the international community. Thank God that Israel continues to be a "light to the nations" (see Isaiah Chapter 49).

(4) Pray that Israel's continued security problems will be foremost on the minds of those dealing with the Palestinians, both in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and in Gaza. Pray that Israel will not be pressured into compromising land for a peace deal that is not just and not lasting. Pray that Israeli negotiators will seek God's wisdom and discernment in all future peace talks with the Palestinians and surrounding Arab nations.

(5) Proclaim Isaiah 26:3 regarding the Israeli people in their quest to seek the God of Israel: "You will keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on You."


Monday, November 30, 2009

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XIX

AMERICAN-ISRAEL RELATIONSHIP

Among American Christian’s there have been some misconceptions about U.S. support for Israel. There’s been talk about President Barack Obama’s sympathies for the Palestinian cause, while at the same time, unrelenting U.S. pressure on Israel, especially concerning settlement growth. Furthermore, these same pro-Israel Americans continue to question the Obama Administration’s loyalty to its only democratic ally in the Middle East.

While it’s true that there have been genuine disagreements between the U.S. and Israel on the Palestinian issue, causing a strain in diplomatic relations, there’s another aspect of this relationship that has been virtually ignored by some Americans….that is, unprecedented and continued military cooperation between the two nations.

The most common question asked of this writer is whether Israel will conduct a pre-emptive strike against Iran in the coming months, and whether the U.S. will, likely, support or abandon Israel if that happens. In addition, there is uncertainty about whether the Obama Administration will share specific military codes with Israel, so that Israel’s air force can fly over certain Middle Eastern countries in the event of war.

It seems the U.S. media has failed to provide adequate information to Americans about unparalleled defense collaboration between the governments of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barak Obama since both men took office.

On October 21, Israel and the U.S. began a joint missile defense drill which concluded on November 12. After the drill each nation stated its shared commitment towards a stable Middle East. The drill was reported to be the largest military exercise ever coordinated between the two countries, using air, sea and land forces. At least 17 U.S. naval war ships were sent to the region. America also deployed the THAAD, Aegis, and PAC-3 anti-missile defense systems into Israel. There was some talk that the Obama Administration would be leaving behind a few U.S. “Patriot’s” in case Israel needed them as a back-up to the Israeli Arrow-2 ballistic missile defense system.

At least 1,400 U.S. troops were deployed into Israel in order to coordinate military exercises with an equal number of IDF soldiers. One report mentioned that there have never been so many U.S. military generals in Israel at one time.

Since both the American and Israeli governments came to power, Israel’s Chief of Staff Lt.-General Gabi Ashkenazi and U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen have communicated with each other on a weekly basis, and have often met together in Israel, America, and Europe to discuss defense strategies.

High-level defense officials have spent 18 months planning for the recent military assignment. Dubbed Juniper Cobra 10, the operation included three main phases. According to Israeli government sources, the "Field Training Exercise," stressed the cooperation between Israeli and U.S. forces in various drills. A computer-simulation "Command Post Exercise" examined the interoperability of Israeli and U.S. air defense systems. A "Live Fire Exercise" tested both Israeli and U.S. air defense systems including the Patriot.

Juniper Cobra 10 allowed the two countries to test what a joint response would look like if there was a potential Iranian strike on Israel. In addition, it included military preparedness for a possible Israeli war with Hezbollah -- Iran’s terrorist proxy in Lebanon. Israel has already warned Syria against sending any more advanced weapons systems to Hezbollah’s armed forces. This comes after Syria recently delivered ¼ of its military arsenal to Hezbollah in the form of long-range and middle-range missiles. A future war with Hezbollah could escalate into a war with Syria. Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak is also closely monitoring Hamas in Gaza, after the terrorist group recently tested an Iranian missile capable of reaching Tel Aviv. Barak is concerned that Israel is losing its qualitative edge in the Middle East, and he will not allow the balance in military power to tip in favor of Israel’s enemies.

According to the Commander of Israel’s Air Force Defense Corps, Brigadier-General Doron Gavish, the Juniper Cobra exercise, “simulated challenging scenarios and the use of the most advanced weapons in the field.” In addition, he added, “The professionalism of the forces and the level of cooperation between the two armies were reflected in the way the forces were activated.”

Confirming the existing military teamwork between Israel and America, the Commander of the U.S. Joint Task Force, Rear Admiral John M. Richardson, recently made this statement: "During the past two weeks, our two forces have stood together and fought through a very challenging scenario. We have brought together new technologies and new procedures. We learned some very valuable lessons and had a tremendous result. I want to thank the Israeli people, and especially the Israel Defense Forces, for their hospitality and cooperation."

While Israel continues to struggle with successfully presenting its diplomatic position to the international community, it has enjoyed extraordinary ties with foreign militaries. This confirms an expanding U.S. led coalition against Iranian nuclear aspirations. However, few Americans understand that while Israel may be considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran, the IDF is looking, first and foremost, to directly securing Israel’s northern and southern borders from attack against Israel’s home front.

According to recent media reports, Israel is a member of a NATO mission called Active Endeavor, based in Naples, Italy, where Israel has representation in an international command center. It is there that Israeli and international military officers share intelligence information about naval ships passing through the waters of the Mediterranean Sea. They try to determine which ships may be suspect of involvement in terrorist acts. The recent Israeli capture of a large Iranian arms cache aboard the Francop ship, reportedly destined for Hezbollah, was part of the success of such intelligence gathering. The captured cache was large enough for Hezbollah to support a month-long war against Israel. The Netanyahu government is relying more and more on shared military intelligence information to help Israel in its war against terror.

So, with this kind of high-level defense cooperation going on between Israel, the U.S. and NATO, it is hard to believe that the Obama Administration would deny Israel specific military codes to fly over certain Middle Eastern countries in the event of a future war with Iran. Furthermore, it has become apparent to those living in the Middle East, that for now, it is a priority of the U.S. Defense Department to stand by Israel, at least when it comes to the close strategic military pact the two countries actively share with one another.

PRAYER POINTS:

(1) Pray that American Christians will have accurate and truthful information about what is going on in the Middle East, especially concerning Israel. (1 Chronicles 12:32).

(2) Pray according to 2 Kings 6:15-16, that Israelis will not fear the enemies that surround them; that the Jewish State will have favor and be able to proclaim that “those who are with us are more than those who are with them.

(3) Pray as David did, according to Psalm 144, that the Lord will:

*Train the hands of IDF soldiers for war, and their fingers for battle;

*Subdue Israel’s enemies;

*Rescue and deliver Israel out of great waters from the hand of foreigners (terrorist leaders) whose mouths speak lying words, and whose right hand is a right hand of falsehood.

Monday, October 5, 2009

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XVIII

Jerusalem, Israel

STRATEGIC COOPERATION -- Deeper Ties between Israeli and Christian Leaders

The New Year on the Hebrew calendar, 5770, began on the eve of September 18th, as Christians and Jews from all over the world began their journey to Israel to celebrate the Fall Feasts. Among them, more than 1500 believers from over 100 countries attended the All Nations Convocation between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. And, more than 5,000 believers from 80 countries attended the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ) Feast of Tabernacles during Succot.

Among those pilgrims who came up to Jerusalem to pray and worship the Lord in His Holy City were Christian government leaders. They met with members of the Israeli Knesset, and forged new ties of understanding and cooperation between Israel and the international community.

MK Yuli Edelstein, Minister of Public Affairs and the Diaspora spoke to government leaders from Switzerland, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Morocco, Mali, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Ethiopia, Uganda, India, Australia, Finland, and Jordan. He gave a short history of Israel’s political dealings, especially concerning the peace process with the Palestinians. He expressed concern that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might be trapped into accepting pre-conditions from Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas before negotiations get underway between the two parties. He also said he does not want to see a division of Jerusalem, or any attempt by the U.S. or other nations to push Israel into a quick and final deal.

The continued attempt by human rights organizations to accuse Israel’s Defense Forces (the IDF) of committing war crimes during Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip in 2008-2009 (Operation Cast Lead), is also a concern for the Israeli government. According to Edelstein, the recent Goldstone report “makes it very difficult for us to stand firm and explain our case.” As head of communications and information for Israel’s Foreign Ministry, Edelstein is responsible for explaining Israel’s case to the world. He claimed that in many countries there are those who do not want to accept the fact that the Jewish people are in Israel because it is their Promised Land. “We are here not because of the Holocaust, but because we’ve always been here,” he declared. Laying claim to the land, Edelstein added, “This is the state of Israel...this is the center of Jewish life.”

The Israeli government is looking for ways to cooperate with internationals in order to enlarge the circle of friends that Israel has around the world. As nations become more and more anti-Semitic, indulging in anti-Israel Jewish hatred, Edelstein wants to spread the message of Israel’s goodwill deeds as the only flourishing democracy in the Middle East. Pro-Israel Christian government leaders are developing new relationships with Israeli officials in an attempt to influence the global diplomatic community.

For example, Edelstein, as well as other Israeli leaders, have been speaking to Christians throughout the Fall Feasts about a “united Jerusalem”. The ICEJ has chosen this issue as a theme for a future diplomatic campaign. Passing out thousands of T-Shirts at the Feast of Tabernacles, inscribed with the city of Jerusalem logo, the ICEJ is hoping that believers will go back to their home countries and engage in a grass roots effort to keep Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. This means, however, being able to effectively win the hearts of parliamentary leaders in their respective governments.

Giovanni Isella is a Christian government leader from Switzerland. In 2005, he formed a political party in the Swiss government based on the Bible. It is the only political party that claims Israel has a right to exist and defend itself. The official party papers also declare that there should be no division of Jerusalem. Isella’s vision is to fill every parliament in every nation in the world with a pro-Israel lobby. He is working with the Israeli Allies Caucus to try and accomplish this.

Speaking about Jerusalem being the undivided capital of the Jewish people, Isella commented, “We said this to the people, and we made a proclamation in Bern two years ago. The people need education about why we stand for Israel.” But, Isella admits that most Swiss politicians are not that interested in Israel. Invited to join an Israeli Allies Caucus meeting in Washington, D.C. several years ago, he asked forgiveness for some of the anti-Israel stands his government has taken. Isella plans to continue his goal of securing support for Israel throughout the world.

While government leaders like Isella look for ways to change the hearts of men who are in global leadership, Israeli officials are reflecting on how well they have explained Israel’s position to the international community. Israeli MK Uzi Landau, Minister of National Infrastructure admitted Israel’s failings at a hotel dinner hosted by the Jerusalem House of Prayer for All Nations. Speaking to Christian government leaders he said, “We have talked too much about security, and we have forgotten the spiritual roots.”

Continuing on that theme, an Arab pastor from Jordan, Afeef Halasah, spoke directly to Israeli officials at the dinner. He tried to convince them that not all Arabs are Israel’s enemies. Halasah explained that there are Christian Arab leaders in his country who love Israel and pray on a daily basis for the government. He proclaimed, “I believe nobody can defeat Israel, but Israel can defeat itself.” Halasah appealed to Israeli leaders to be more accommodating towards their Arab friends. And, he gave a warning to Israel to remain faithful to the Lord. “Don’t turn your back for any reason. Don’t try to trade the God given inheritance to you. If you are faithful to God, He will never abandon you.”

As the Fall Feasts conclude, one thing is certain, Israeli government leaders are looking the world over for new friends. Christian leaders in the nations are looking for greater influence within Israeli government circles. As this partnership deepens, it brings to the Middle East a new refreshing spiritual dynamic, and may move the hearts of men to seek a deeper faith in God.

“For unto us a Child is born. Unto us a Son is given: And, the government will be upon His shoulder. And, His name will be called, Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of His government and peace, there will be no end. Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom; to order it and establish it with judgment and justice; from this time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.” Isaiah 9:6-7.

PRAYER POINTS:

(1) Pray for higher levels of cooperation between the Israeli government and Christian government leaders from the nations.

(2) Pray for men and women of stature, who walk in the Lord's righteousness and justice, to be raised up as Godly leaders in global governmental arenas. Pray they would be men and women who have a biblical world view with God's understanding and compassionate heart for Israel.

(3) Declare Isaiah Chapter 45:1-3 and Jeremiah 1:10 over these leaders. Pray for God's plans and purposes to be fulfilled according to Isaiah Chapter 49.

(4) Pray that the Goldstone report, that unfairly accuses the IDF of war crimes, would lose steam and effectiveness within the global community. Pray that no weapon formed against Israel will prosper. Intercede according to Psalm 37, that God will bring righteousness and justice into the light. Pray that the Lord will contend with those who contend with Israel. (Psalm 35:1).

(5) Intercede for a "united Jerusalem" under Israeli sovereignty. Remember that, "As the mountains surround Jerusalem, the Lord surrounds His people, now and forevermore." (Psalm 125:2). God loves Jerusalem and Zion is His Holy City.

(6) Proclaim the Lord's favor over the Israeli people and their God given land, according to His Covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Rejoice that the Lord is, "I AM WHO I AM", and has been sent to the children of Israel to help them. (See Exodus 3:14-15).

Monday, September 21, 2009

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XVII

Jerusalem, Israel

MIDDLE EAST ARMS BUILD-UP AND DEFENSE COOPERATION

While the U.S. and Israel attempt to move forward on a diplomatic track towards a comprehensive peace deal in the Middle East, a military track is also advancing, with some of the largest coordinated exercises ever to take place in the region.

As U.S. anti-missile defense systems make their way overseas, Israel is refining and finishing off the final touches on its own systems, which are meant to intercept short, middle, and long range missiles if they are launched against Israel in the future.

ARMS SALES

A massive arms build-up in the Middle East is also taking place, as Iran delivers more sophisticated weapons to Hezbollah through Syria; and, as Russia becomes one of the biggest arms dealers to both nations. Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak is keeping a keen eye on the delivery of weapons systems, making sure that the balance of power in the Middle East is not tipped in favor of Israel’s enemies. Russia has been warned not to deliver the S-300 advanced anti-missile defense system to Iran or to any country that is hostile towards Israel. Israeli officials are also watching to see if Russia tries to deliver an advanced jet fighter system to Syria, which would be an unacceptable move, according to the Jewish State. The international community can be assured that Israel will figure out a way to wipe out the systems before they are ever operational. This alone could start a new war in the Middle East.

ISRAEL’S HOME FRONT PREPARATIONS

Without an end in sight to stopping Iran’s nuclear pursuit, preparations are being made on Israel’s home front for what may be a long drawn out conflict should all diplomatic efforts fail, including crippling UN or EU sanctions against the Islamic state.

As of this writing, U.S. naval missile ships have arrived in Israel in preparation for a joint missile defense exercise to take place in October 2009. The highest ranking officials in both the IDF and the Pentagon have been holding frequent meetings in what has become a strengthened Israeli-U.S. defense cooperation pact. While America is not anxious to broadcast its military partnership with Israel, it has been reported that the U.S. plans to deploy ships in the Mediterranean and Red Sea capable of intercepting ballistic missiles. Israel already has an advanced X-Band radar system given to the Jewish State by former U.S. President George W. Bush.

Meanwhile, in June 2009, Israel conducted a nationwide emergency drill, setting off alarm systems throughout the land. It was a civil-defense exercise in which citizens were instructed to go to bomb shelters within minutes of hearing the sounds of sirens. Schools educated their students in how to protect themselves in the event of war.

In January 2010, the National Emergency Authority plans to hold another nationwide drill, this time simulating a biological attack against Israel. The IDF Medical Corps, along with the IDF Home Front Command, police, and rescue squads will participate in these drills.

In August 2009, journalists were invited to observe simulation exercises at an IDF medical base in Tel Aviv. In both indoor and outdoor simulations, the media witnessed what IDF medics do in emergency situations in urban warfare. A Hollywood-type set on the base was built to look like a street in Gaza City. Graffiti and drawings of Islamic martyrs were plastered on the walls. There were narrow alleyways and bombed out cars strewn along the streets. To the sound of Islamic holy prayers, gunshots could be heard. In the simulation, IDF soldiers shot and killed a “terrorist”. As they attempted to secure the parameters, they too were “wounded” on the battlefield. Medics were called in to treat the “wounded”.

According to IDF Sergeant Arnold Starkowtiz, an instructor of the IDF medical development team, “In the real situation, the alleys are much closer together, and sometimes it is very hard to walk through a street.” When asked about the potential for booby trapping against IDF soldiers, he replied, “The forces take a lot of precautionary steps when they move into a situation like that. There is always a tracker or someone who walks at the head of the field, always looking out and always being aware.” The IDF medical school trains soldiers for the worst case scenario. Their training at the base helps them save lives on the battlefield.

“The first thing we do is finish the fighting. Before you start treating the wounded, each medic is a soldier, a warrior. He first finishes the combat. So, if there is a group of terrorists, the soldier would first neutralize the threat, and only then start treating the wounded,” he said.

The medical base is one of the biggest training bases in Israel. Every year they train 2,300-2,500 medics. Most of them are in combat units. These simulation exercises are another attempt by Israeli defense forces to prepare the public for future outbreaks of war. The IDF plans to begin handing out gas masks to the general public by November 2009. Most Israelis do not think gas masks will help in a biological and chemical attack. They are more inclined to believe that Israel’s nuclear arsenal is enough of a deterrence to keep Israel’s enemies from considering a non-conventional attack on the Jewish State.

THE ENEMY’S WEAPONS

Both Syria and Hezbollah reportedly have chemical munitions factories, and Syria is developing biological capability. Syria has long-range Scud missiles that could carry a chemical or biological payload. Hezbollah has been stocking its deadly chemicals since December 2008, and recently received chemical weapons and protective gear from Iran. Syria is upgrading its missile, rocket, air defense, and antitank capabilities. Iran has reportedly upgraded its ballistic missiles to satellite launchers capable of eventually launching nuclear weapons into the atmosphere. Iran is on a fast-paced track with North Korea to find a way of putting a nuclear payload on a long-range missile. Iran could opt, instead, to put one on a short-range missile and ship it to Hezbollah or to the Lebanese Armed Forces. Meanwhile, Hezbollah is now boasting of having 80,000 rockets aimed at Israel. At the same time, Hamas continues to smuggle sophisticated arms into underground tunnels in the Gaza Strip, increasing its weapons arsenals.

KEEPING A QUALITATIVE EDGE

While the Middle East arms build-up is continually evaluated by Israeli defense officials, the Jewish State is looking to America to help supply it with the most advanced weapons systems in the world. This includes a potential contract for 20-25 U.S. F-35 Joint Strike Jet Fighters. Israel is arguing with U.S. defense officials about wanting complete technical control over the electronic systems on the plane. So far, the U.S. has refused to allow Israel that flexibility. The cost of each plane has gone up to $100 million. Israel will continue to look for the best systems available to keep a qualitative edge over its hostile Middle East neighbors.

To that end, Israel is also trying to bolster air support to its ground forces for future military clashes in Lebanon and Gaza. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) has been flight testing a new version of the Black Hawk utility helicopter that is equipped with offensive air-to-surface missile launchers. The helicopter has been fitted with a rapid fire cannon. Israel is looking to American defense industries to upgrade six additional Apache attack helicopters.

THE IRANIAN THREAT AND ISRAEL’S RESPONSE

While military preparations continue, some Israeli officials have denied that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran. Some argue that Iran will not have nuclear capability for 3-5 years. Others say that Iran will have that capability in 6-9 months. While not all agree on the same timetable of Iran’s potential to “go nuclear”, most Israeli officials do agree on one crucial point.... They do not think that Iran wants to engage in a direct war with Israel.

Major General (Ret.) Eitan Ben Eliyahu, former Commander of the Israeli Air Force (IAF), spoke at the World Summit on Counter-Terrorism in Herzliya. He said, “States like Iran do it in a different way. If you look at the Syrians, they took advantage of having Lebanon next to them; having Hezbollah next to them; and, indirectly they launched a terror attack against Israel; which means, they stayed clean.” According to Eliyahu, 90% of the terror attacks in Lebanon were Syrian initiatives.

Eliyahu claims that the goal of the Iranians is to finance the terrorists, to politically back them, and to build a nuclear weapon. In doing so, Iran inspires terrorists to attack Israel. But, Eliyahu does not think Iran is interested in direct military action against the Jewish State. Instead, Iran will look to continue using its proxies (Hezbollah and Hamas) to accomplish its goals. “They want to play double face – a legal government in the international society; and, on the other hand, supporting terrorism against Israel and other states.”

As 2010 approaches, Israelis expect to see more jet fighters going for long practice runs over the Mediterranean Sea. They also expect to participate in more national emergency drills that will require them to clean out their bomb shelters and stack them with necessary supplies. And, they expect to hear more news stories about Israel’s military track than the current diplomatic track that seems to be going nowhere.

PRAYER POINTS:

(1) Pray that the God of Israel will mobilize His heavenly troops to fight Israel's enemies.

(2) Pray that Israel will continue to keep its qualitative edge over its enemies in the Middle East region.

(3) Declare that "He who keeps Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep." And, that the Lord shall preserve Israel from all evil, (according to Psalm 121, verses 4 and 7). Continue to intercede for Israel's protection from enemy forces that want to attack the Jewish State.

(4) Proclaim Israel's readiness through God's training of the IDF and IAF, according to Psalm 18:34, which states: “He teaches my hands to make war, so that my arms can bend a bow of bronze.”

(5) Pray for Israel to have favor with the U.S. Defense Department and that all difficulties will be worked out regarding the purchase of American F-35 jet fighter planes. Pray that Israel can use these planes to adequately defend its forces in the future.

(6) Pray for the homefront in Israel to be prepared, and ask the Lord to give insight to those who oversee the civilian population.

(7) Pray that God will deliver the nation from any snare or any trap presented by international leaders who do not have Israel's best interest in mind. (See Psalm 83).

(8) Ask God to raise up intercessors who pray night and day for Israel during times of peace and times of war.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XVI

Jerusalem, Israel

ISRAELI DIPLOMACY IN THE FACE OF EUROPEAN ANTI-SEMITISM

In recent days, a rift has been caused between the Israeli and Swedish governments over false reporting in a Swedish newspaper which accused Israel of blood libel. The popular Swedish daily, Aftonbladet, with a reported mass circulation of just under 1.5 million copies daily, claims that Israel’s Defense Forces (IDF) kidnapped and murdered Palestinian Arabs in order to harvest their organs for transplanting. This anti-Semitic rhetoric, now hidden under the mask of so-called “investigative journalism” is an excuse for Jew hatred. It is being encouraged and influenced by Sweden’s large Moslem population.

HISTORIC ANTI-SEMITISM

This kind of anti-Semitism has occurred throughout history, going back to accusations before the Middle Ages, fueling Nazi propaganda into the 20th century and beyond. While the Swedish government has refused to condemn the offensive material, hiding under the banner of “freedom of speech” as spelled out in the Swedish constitution, new evidence has revealed that Sweden’s media is partially government controlled. So, it is possible that Swedish government leaders have given their tacit approval to the reporting of offensive anti-Semitic material. This is not the first article from this well-known newspaper that has sought to demonize Israel while supporting the so-called Palestinian cause.

DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES

A recent report indicates that Moslems will make up 20% of the populations of European Union countries by 2050. With these changing demographics, trends also indicate a steep rise in European anti-Semitism. Between January and June 2009, there were 609 anti-Semitic incidents reported in the U.K. alone. The three countries likely to see the fastest increase in Moslem populations are the U.K., Holland, and Spain. These populations are now being fueled by Moslem hatred of Western values, especially Judeo-Christian principles. The outcries of “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press” fuels anti-Western propaganda including bias against Israel, as well as anti-Semitism against Jews, worldwide.

DIPLOMACY UNDER FIRE

What’s troubling for Israel is the diplomatic fall-out that could result in damaged relations with Sweden. The Swedish government assumed the European Union (EU) presidency on July 1, and since then, Israel has complained of unfair treatment. There have already been diplomatic tensions between the two countries over Israel’s eviction of Palestinians from a Jewish-owned home in East Jerusalem.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in Europe now, trying to convince the U.K. and Germany that Israel has frozen settlement growth. He is hoping to work out a formula with U.S. peace envoy George Mitchell that will allow Israel to finish construction on 2500 homes before freezing all settlement construction for possibly as long as two years. Netanyahu also has the task of convincing other European nations that Israel’s intentions are sincere. The Europeans are anxious to see movement on peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. With Sweden in the driver’s seat, as head of the EU now, Israel has a long path to climb in international diplomacy.

PRESSURE ON ISRAEL REGARDING THE NUCLEAR ISSUE

Little attention has been given to the fact that the Arab League has urged Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt to support an Arab resolution calling for Israel to open up its nuclear program to EU scrutiny. In September, a 150-nation general assembly of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be meeting, where votes will be counted on measures that criticize Israel, such as the nuclear issue. Most important are the votes of 27 EU member states that have the power to censure Israel at the IAEA conference.

The Arab League will be asking the IAEA to help encourage the implementation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty – a treaty that Israel has refused to sign. U.S. President Barack Obama has called for the abolishment of global nuclear weapons, which has fueled anti-Israel sentiment, and added pressure on the Jewish State to sign the treaty. Meanwhile, the EU and Israel are awaiting Bildt’s answer to see whether he will encourage the passing of the Arab League resolution, which would result in the censorship of Israel’s nuclear program.

PARLIAMENTARY DIPLOMACY

In the midst of tensions between Israel and Europe, a new diplomatic forum has been created to bring European Parliamentary members together with Israeli Knesset members. In July, MK Yohanan Plesner (Kadima Party), along with the European Forum of the Knesset (EFK), held an historic first meeting, attended by several European ambassadors to Israel. Israeli Opposition Leader Tzippi Livni, Speaker of the Knesset Reuven Rivlin, and other high-ranking Israeli politicians were given a chance to express their views at the meeting on “parliamentary diplomacy”.

The purpose of the gathering was to strengthen relations between Israel and European parliaments. Fiamma Nirenstein, Vice President of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, reported that Sweden has been financing a radical NGO in the guise of human rights and humanitarian aid. She further stated, “In general, through the Barcelona Process, Europe fuels the conflict, funding all the organizations that call Israel a regime of apartheid and accuse it of war crimes.” Sweden is one of the countries mentioned by Nirenstein that gives funds to The Palestinian Center for Human Rights to promote “the culture of hate and war.”

In Rome, Nirenstein hopes to establish an Inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating anti-Semitism. She plans to gather more than 40 parliamentary diplomats from throughout the world that are committed to defending the rights of the Jewish people.

FUTURE DIPLOMACY – ISRAEL AND EUROPE

Israel fights an uphill battle in convincing European parliaments to stop the spread of anti-Israel hatred, as well as anti-Semitism of global Jewish communities. This is especially true after the tight-lipped response of Sweden’s Foreign Minister Bildt, who refused to condemn the Aftonbladet blood libel article. Because Sweden is one of the world’s largest per-capita donors to the Palestinian cause, Israel will have to take great care in diplomatic dealings with Sweden during its hold on the EU presidency. Hopefully, Bildt’s response to Arab pressure at the IAEA conference will also be tightlipped, giving grace to Israel when it comes to reporting on the Jewish nation’s nuclear capabilities.

Meanwhile, Israel is counting on the U.K. and Germany to convince Sweden that the Jewish State has already begun a settlement freeze in the West Bank.

Israel is also counting on Netanyahu’s trip abroad to result in a favorable working relationship with European leaders, despite the ever-increasing hostile environment Jews continue to face on the streets of most European cities today.

"I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you; and, in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” Genesis 12:3

PRAYER POINTS:

Pray for healing to come between Israel and Sweden.

Pray that all blood libel accusations will cease immediately.

Pray that it will not fuel the fire of anti-Semitism in Europe.

Pray that God will change the hearts of people that have turned their back on Israel and the Jewish people.

Pray that the Lord will stop the scourge of global anti-Semitism. (See Psalm Chapter 35; 2 Corinthians 10:3-5).

Pray protection over Israel in regard to evil plots that threaten the Jewish state. (See Exodus 15:6-13; Esther 8:17).

Monday, July 27, 2009

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- XV

Jerusalem, Israel

THE BATTLE OVER JERUSALEM


A key issue expected to be in the forefront of Israel’s diplomatic discussions with the United States, Europe, and the international community is the status of Jerusalem. The current disagreement regarding a settlement freeze, in dispute between U.S. and Israeli officials, points not only to building construction in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), but also to the building of apartments in East Jerusalem.

On July 19, 2009, at a weekly government cabinet meeting, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "I would like to re-emphasize that united Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish people and of the State of Israel. Our sovereignty over it cannot be challenged.... We cannot accept the idea that Jews will not have the right to live and purchase in all parts of Jerusalem. I can only describe to myself what would happen if someone would propose that Jews could not live in certain neighborhoods in New York, London, Paris or Rome. There would certainly be a major international outcry. Accordingly, we cannot agree to such a decree in Jerusalem. This has been the policy of Israeli governments over the years and it is also the policy of our government."

While a majority of Israelis are in agreement about Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem, virtually all governments of Arab states, along with the Palestinian Authority, claim that the Palestinians must have their own state with East Jerusalem as its capital. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has agreed to a de-militarized Palestinian state, but he has not agreed to shared control over Jerusalem.

Under previous Israeli governments, negotiations have been freely conducted with Palestinian officials over West Bank withdrawals. Israel has offered land swaps in exchange for keeping major settlement blocs. Yet, the key issue of Jerusalem has not been publicly talked about to any great length. Netanyahu plans to follow the Road Map to its end – which means, discussing the fate of Jerusalem, but only in final status talks with the Palestinians and Arab states. The recent controversy over Israeli building construction in East Jerusalem suggests that, despite what compromises Israel is willing to make over West Bank settlements, the status of Jerusalem will remain non-negotiable until the peace process reaches that final stage.

U.S., Palestinian, and European leaders have had difficulty with Israel’s stringent diplomatic policy regarding the Holy City. However, there has been a continued, unified Israeli consensus that Jerusalem should not be divided, and that is shared by many Jews around the world who have a special affinity for the city.

While Jerusalem was discussed privately between Israel and the Palestinians during former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s reign in office, the media leaked information about the talks, and part of Olmert’s coalition threatened to quit if the government didn’t stop the negotiations. Despite former Foreign Minister Tzippi Livni’s insistence that Jerusalem wasn’t a main topic of conversation with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, reports indicate that she and Olmert were willing to divide the city in two ways: (1) Some Arab neighborhoods would be given over to Palestinian control. (2) The “Holy Basin” (holy sites) would be under international control. But, these discussions were not contained in legally binding letters or documents; nothing was voted on in the Knesset; and, there was no successful achievement in peace talks on the future status of the city.

Most westerners understand only part of the controversy over Jerusalem. Critics of Israel who defend the Palestinian position explain that Israel can keep control over the western part of the city. These critics don’t take into account that the Temple Mount, an essential landmark in Israel’s biblical history, is located in East Jerusalem, as is the Western Wall, the only authentic outer wall still standing since the Second Temple was destroyed in 70 AD.

Pro-Israel supporters, while understanding the controversy over East Jerusalem, and the importance of the holy sites to the Jewish people, may not realize that the Palestinians are not just talking about controlling parts of the Old City within the walls. They want to control well-established Jewish neighborhoods outside the walls, such as French Hill, Ramot, East Talpiot, Gilo, Har Homa, and Pisgat Ze’ev. These Jerusalem neighborhoods that were built after the 1967 Six Day War have continued to be referred to as “settlements” by the Palestinians.

Recently, Palestinian leader Salaam Fayad announced that the Palestinian Authority will invest tens of millions of dollars in Jerusalem’s Arab neighborhoods. The Palestinians now consider Jerusalem a top national priority. They have adopted the same words that the Israeli government has used to describe sovereignty over the city. The Palestinians claim that Jerusalem will be the “eternal” capital of their state. Like the U.S. State Department, the Palestinians have called for an end to Israeli settlement construction, not just in the West Bank, but also in Jerusalem and its surroundings.

On July 22, 2009, at a press conference in New York City, visiting Mayor of Jerusalem Nir Barkat proclaimed: “Jerusalem is the capital of Israel – the heart and soul of the Jewish people... We will stand strongly against any intervention to try and divide Jerusalem. I am proud that there has never been greater freedom of religion in the city of Jerusalem than under the flag of Israel – where everyone is free to practice their beliefs in public and visit their holy sites. The future of Jerusalem is quite clear. It must stay the undivided capital of the State of Israel.”

Yet, international leaders have commented that Israel’s current government is not accepting the fact that the Palestinians, as well as Arab states, will never agree to a Palestinian state without East Jerusalem as its capital. Some officials, like European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, have called for the United Nations Security Council to push forward the recognition of a Palestinian state even without a final status agreement. That would politically legitimize Palestinian claims. Such a move would give the Palestinians recognition before the United Nations as a full member state. It would be their claim, equally against Israel’s claim, regarding the final status of Jerusalem.

Exacerbating the Israeli-Palestinian dialogue over this issue is the fact that Netanyahu has had to contend with U.S. President Barack Obama’s political leanings toward the Palestinians. Israeli foreign policy analysts see Obama as more supportive of the Palestinian position than any U.S. president going back to the Carter Administration.

Obama’s White House press secretary announced in June 2009, in response to Netanyahu’s famous Bar-Ilan speech, Obama’s vision for the Middle East: “Two states, a Jewish State of Israel and an independent Palestine, in the historic homeland of both peoples”. If Obama believes that the Palestinians have equal rights to the Promised Land then he, most likely, has concluded that they are entitled to shared control of Jerusalem.

Without a biblical world view, there are no boundaries as to what the Obama Administration might do to pressure Israel into releasing sovereignty over the city. One way that the U.S. has already pressured Israel is by imposing greater restrictions on how Israel can spend the military aid it receives from America. This might develop into a military freeze on needed advanced weapons systems. It could include restrictions on the sale of the F-35 jet stealth fighter that Israel hopes to add to its air force arsenal. The fighter jet would give Israel a qualitative edge over its enemies.

Regardless of the amount of pressure that America puts on Israel, there are biblical reasons that the Jewish State cannot release control over Jerusalem. When Obama gave his famous Cairo speech in June 2009, Israeli leaders were shocked that he omitted Israel’s legal and historical rights to the land. But, these same leaders did not speak openly of the biblical rights of the Jewish people to live in Israel and to dwell in Jerusalem.

There are over 800 references to Jerusalem in the Strong’s Concordance. God has chosen the city for Himself, to put His name there. (I Kings 11:36; 2 Chronicles 6:6). The House of the Lord is built in Jerusalem (1 Chronicles 6:32, Ezra 1:2-5; Ezra 5:15). David gathers all Israel together in Jerusalem to bring up the ark of the Lord to its resting place (1 Chronicles 15:3). The God of Israel gives rest to His people that they might dwell in Jerusalem forever. (1 Chronicles 23:25). The tribes of Israel seek the Lord in Jerusalem, sacrificing to the God of their fathers. (2 Chronicles 11:16; Psalm 122:3-5). God saves His people, brings them back from other lands, and there is deliverance in Jerusalem among the remnant that the Lord calls. (Zechariah 8:7-8; Joel 2:32; Isaiah 52:7-10).

God, Himself, returns to Zion and dwells in the midst of Jerusalem (Psalm 135:21; Zechariah 8:3). He roars from Zion and utters His voice from Jerusalem (Joel 3:16; Amos 1:2). The word of the Lord goes forth from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3; Micah 4:2). Jerusalem is called the Throne of the Lord and all the nations are gathered to it (Jeremiah3:17; Zechariah 8:22). God sets Jerusalem in the midst of the nations and the countries all around her. (Ezekiel 5:5). His name is declared in Zion and His praise in Jerusalem. (Psalm 102:21).

Pro-Israel supporters should consider it imperative to be watchmen on the walls, praying for the peace of Jerusalem, and giving the Lord no rest until He establishes Jerusalem as a praise in the earth. (Psalm 122:6-9; Psalm 137:5-6; Psalm 147:12-14; Isaiah 62:6-7).

Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem goes back thousands of years, something that the Palestinians can’t claim as their inheritance. Yet, the dispute over Jerusalem may be the catalyst that breaks down all peace talks and leads to a battle which causes the nations of the earth to stumble over God’s will for His Holy City.

“Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of drunkenness to all the surrounding peoples, when they lay siege against Judah and Jerusalem. And, it shall happen in that day that I will make Jerusalem a very heavy stone for all peoples; all who would heave it away will surely be cut in pieces, though all nations of the earth are gathered against it.”
Zechariah 12:2-3

SITUATION ANALYSIS -- 242

  Jerusalem, Israel PRAYER UPDATE – JULY 29, 2026 Israel and the Nations GPW News   Starting with the Lord’s Kingdom Authority a...

Blog Archive